MEDICO-LEGAL APPLICATIONS OF FRACTURE HEMATOMA: REVIEW.

This review aimed to elucidate the critical role of fracture hematoma in forensic medicine, with a specific focus on its utility in differentiating antemortem from postmortem fractures. The study seeks to provide a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on the subject, highlighting the biological and medico-legal implications of fracture hematoma analysis in forensic investigations. A systematic review of literature was conducted, encompassing various scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on studies published from 2000 to 2024. The search employed keywords such as "fracture hematoma," "antemortem fractures," "perimortem fractures" and "postmortem fractures," among others, to explore relevant data. Selected studies were scrutinized based on their relevance, the presence of substantial data on fracture hematoma, and their contribution to forensic analysis. The review underscores the significance of fracture hematoma as an indicator of antemortem injuries, revealing that active blood circulation at the time of injury facilitates hematoma formation. Detailed analyses within the selected studies illustrate the interplay of cellular and molecular dynamics within fracture hematomas, emphasizing the roles of cytokines, particularly IL-6, and cellular constituents in the healing process. Fracture hematoma analysis emerges as a vital forensic tool in establishing the vitality of bone fractures, enhancing the accuracy of forensic assessments. However, the review also acknowledges the challenges posed by individual healing variability and postmortem changes, suggesting a need for further research to refine the interpretative frameworks used in forensic hematoma analysis.

COMPARISON OF HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE VERSUS RESECTION WITH PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS IN MANAGEMENT OF LEFT SIDED COLON CANCER OBSTRUCTION: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of left-sided malignant colon obstruction: Hartmann's procedure (HP) and Resection with primary anastomosis (RPA). 90 Patients with diagnosis of left-sided malignant colon obstructions were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: Hartmann's procedure (HP) group and Resection and Primary anastomosis group (RPA). Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups: hospital stay days, duration of the surgery, postoperative complications (during 30 days after surgery) and mortality was assessed. 37 patients were enrolled in the Hartmann's procedure (HP) group and 53 patients were enrolled in the Primary anastomosis (RPA) group and had undergone different types of colon resections with primary anastomosis. There was 1mortality in HP group and 1 in RPA group. In RPA group, there were 7 complications (13.2%). 1 intraabdominal abscess after colorectal anastomosis, which was cured with antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage; 5 cases of wound infections, 1- leak of colorectal anastomosis and in Hartmann's procedure group there were 8 (21.6%) complications (7 - wound infections, 1-necrosis of colostomy). But this difference is not statistically reliable (p=0.110). In stenting RPA stay were - 6 days and in HP group, it was 8 days. This difference is statistically reliable (P=0.02). In case of left-sided malignant colon obstructions, Primary anastomosis intervention should be preferred, rather than Hartmann's procedure. In the future it's needed to perform the randomized trials, which will study the long-term outcomes (recurrence of cancer, survival rate) of this treatment method.

COMPARISON OF THE PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL AND INTRAVENOUS ANALGESIA AFTER OPEN COLORECTAL SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two common analgesic techniques: patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IVPCA) in patients undergoing open colorectal surgeries. 130 patients were randomized in two groups: group I - n=65 (27 males, 38 females, age range 23-75) - whose postoperative period and pain was managed with PCEA; group II - n=65 (31 male, 34 female, age range 23-75) - whose postoperative period and pain was managed with IVPCA. There were no significant differences by demographic and preoperative factors between the groups. The study demonstrates, that both analgesia techniques in colorectal surgery patients, IVPCA and PCEA, resulted in high levels of satisfaction (as reflected by a median score of 4 on the 1-5 scale), and provided effective management of postoperative pain. There were no differences in the pain scores on the postoperative visual analogue scales, analgesic requirements and satisfaction score between groups. This indicates that IVPCA and Epidural PCA are equally effective to control the postoperative pain after open colorectal surgery.

ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY VS TRADITIONAL CARE IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

The objective and the goal of this study was to determine how ERAS guidelines affected on hospital stay days and other complications rates in case of elective colorectal surgery in our clinic, compared to traditional care methods. First of all, all team members including surgeons, anesthetists, nurses were being trained in ERAS guidelines principals during two months and we started active implementation process after this. 87 patients, who were needed to be done colorectal surgery treatment, were actively treated according to ERAS guidelines and these patients were gathered in experimental group. At the same time, we started to collect data retrospectively from last 2 years elective colorectal surgery cases and sorted them according to preoperative, intraoperative surgical and anesthesia data, postoperative analgesia, all type of complications. 120 patients were placed in traditional care group (control group). In traditional care group open colorectal surgery was associated with long length of stay 8-10 days. High rates of surgical site infection-24.2%, readmission rate during 30 days-30.8%, PONV-44.2%, respiratory complication-6.7%, deep vein thrombosis-3.3%, urinary retention-2.5%, prolonged postoperative ileus 16.7%. We included 87 patients in ERAS care group during 2 years. In this group our study showed big reduction of hospital stay days and it was average 5 days. Compared to traditional care group incidence of respiratory complications was 0, postoperative PONV- 6.9%, postoperative ileus-5.7%, deep vein thrombosis-0, urinary retention-0, readmission rate-0, surgical site infection-3.4%.